Skip to content

Resource Allocation Example

Every online reputation management campaign is tailor-made to cater to the unique needs of each individual or organization. The table below gives a snapshot of how resources might be allocated during different stages of a standard campaign, starting from its inception to subsequent months. It’s important to emphasize that this is just a representative model, and each campaign is uniquely structured based on specific goals and requirements.

StepActionStartupFirst MonthAvg. Month
Campaign setup  
 Project initialization5%  
 Client questionnaire (CQ)5%  
 Internal kickoff meeting10%  
 External kickoff meeting5%  
 Asset organization5%  
 Monitoring and tracking1%  
 Competitive research5%  
 SEO research10%  
 Technical research10%  
 Publisher research10%  
 Owned web property strategy5%  
 Earned web property strategy10% 5%
 Promotion strategy10%  
 Knowledge Panel strategy2%  
 Listings strategy2%  
 Wikipedia strategy5%  
 Content planning 10% 
 Content development 30%15%
 Content outreach 0%15%
 Content promotion 13%10%
 Database updates 5% 
 Wikipedia content 5% 
 Website development 20% 
 Profile development  10%
 Social media development  5%
 Schema development 2% 
 Wikipedia development  10%
 SEO  20%
 Listings management 10% 
 Outreach  10%
 Social recommendations 5% 

The table details how an online reputation management campaign is a structured process involving various phases like setup, research, strategy formulation, content creation, development, and promotion. Complementing these phases are administrative tasks such as project management, quality control, and specializations like SEO and SEM.

While the table provides a blueprint for a fundamental suppression campaign suitable for a notable company eligible for a Wikipedia page, variations arise if there are specific requirements.

For instance, campaigns may differ if they encompass development and promotion in languages other than English, involve review management, require content removal negotiations, or have a heavy SEO focus, among other potential variances.

Variables Affecting Online Reputation Campaign Budgets

An online reputation management campaign is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Various factors influence its complexity, duration, and, therefore, the associated costs.

Recognizing these variables is essential when planning and budgeting for a successful reputation management strategy. Below are some of the pivotal factors that can influence campaign budgets:

  1. Editing Environment Challenge: Platforms and websites have distinct content editing and removal policies. Sites that are stringent or resistant to content changes can demand more resources, both in terms of time and specialized expertise.
  2. Strength of Negative Online Content: The more authoritative and credible a website is that hosts negative content, the harder it is to mitigate its effects. For instance, a disparaging article from a renowned news outlet would usually be more challenging to address than a complaint on a lesser-known publication.
  3. Historical Scandals: Past controversies or scandals can be a thorn in the side of reputation management efforts. The depth, breadth, and recency of the scandal can play a significant role in determining the effort required to manage its online footprint.
  4. Industry-Specific Reputational Risks: Some sectors are inherently more susceptible to reputational hazards. For example, industries like crypto, finance, and healthcare often face greater scrutiny due to their impact on consumers and the environment. Consequently, reputation management in these fields may require a more substantial investment.
  5. Location and Geographical Reach: A global company operating in multiple countries or regions might face reputational challenges in various languages, cultures, and jurisdictions. This multiplicity can complicate and raise the costs of a reputation management campaign.
  6. Digital Presence Maturity: Companies with an established and robust online presence might find it slightly easier to manage their reputation. In contrast, businesses with a weak or negligible online footprint might need more investment to build their presence before managing their reputation.
  7. Competitor Activity: In some cases, competitors might engage in smear campaigns or negative SEO tactics. The intensity of such activities can substantially influence the resources required for defense and positive image building.
  8. Publicity Level: A high-profile company or individual, frequently in the public eye, might face more significant challenges due to the volume and diversity of content generated about them. It’s often called “tall poppy syndrome“. This can lead to a need for more continuous monitoring and rapid response capabilities.
  9. Legal Considerations: Sometimes, addressing online reputation issues may involve legal avenues, especially in cases of defamation or false information spread maliciously. Legal routes can be resource-intensive and might affect the overall budget.

Understanding these variables is crucial for organizations and individuals to allocate adequate resources and strategize effectively for their online reputation management. Every scenario demands a bespoke approach, and awareness of potential challenges ensures better preparation and more successful outcomes.

Ready to Take the Next Step?

Get in touch with our team and we’ll take the first steps toward improving your online profile.

Contact sales