All Services

Wikipedia Services Editing, creation, and monitoring.

Whether your article is wrong, missing, or simply unwatched, there is a specific service for it. This page explains the three, how they differ, and which one fits your situation.

Trusted by companies and individuals worldwide since 2005

★★★★★ Google
A+ BBB Rating
★★★★★ Trustpilot
5.0 Glassdoor
★★★★★ Clutch
The short answer

Reputation X offers three Wikipedia services. Editing corrects errors, outdated facts, and biased wording in an existing article. Creation researches, drafts, and submits a new article for subjects that meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. Monitoring watches an existing article for changes and tells you what to do about them. All three work through independent editors under Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest rules, and none can guarantee a specific outcome, because volunteer editors decide what stays.

Which service

Editing, Creation, or Monitoring?

The state of your article decides the service. Most clients need one to start and monitoring afterward.

Editing, Creation, or Monitoring?
The situation The approach Service Typical time Starting price
An article exists and it is inaccurate, outdated, or biased Research sources and propose neutral, cited corrections through independent editors Wikipedia Editing 1–6 months depending on complexity From $3k/month
No article exists and the subject has significant independent coverage Assess notability, develop sources, draft and submit a new article Wikipedia Create Varies with notability; see the project timeline From $3k/month
An article exists and you need to know when it changes Watch every edit, flag the ones that matter, and recommend a response Wikipedia Monitoring Ongoing, billed monthly From $750/month

Starting prices are the published minimums on our pricing page. Wikipedia work is not billed hourly; the pricing model page explains why. See pricing · Why Wikipedia work is not billed hourly · Project timeline

Results

Wikipedia Case Studies

SaaS / website builder Wikipedia Editing

Correcting a Long-Standing Wikipedia Article for a Website-Builder Platform

A sourcing and accuracy pass across a long-standing article and its related pages for a global website-building platform, plus a process for keeping them current.

27 Pages Outcome (change in inaccurate/outdated coverage)
2 Weeks Time to first confirmed edit or correction
Ongoing Total engagement duration
Read Case Study
Freight rail / transportation logistics Wikipedia Editing

Wikipedia Accuracy Work for a Major Freight Rail Operator

Neutrality and sourcing work on a heavily edited article for a major freight rail operator, where regulators, investors and the public were all reading the same page.

90% Better Outcome (change in inaccurate/outdated coverage)
3 Weeks Time to first confirmed edit or correction
Ongoing Total engagement duration
Read Case Study
Healthcare / pediatric nonprofit Wikipedia Editing

Updating the Record for a Nonprofit Pediatric Health Network

A factual update for a nonprofit pediatric health network that had outgrown its own article, including a successful defense against a proposal to merge away its sub-pages.

Merge Defeated Outcome (change in inaccurate/outdated coverage)
4 Weeks Time to first confirmed edit or correction
12 Months Total engagement duration
Read Case Study

All case studies

FAQ

Wikipedia Services FAQs

Not sure whether you qualify, or what your article needs?

Send us the article, or the name, and we will tell you which service fits and what a realistic outcome looks like.

Get Your Free Assessment
1-800-889-4812 info@reputationx.com